The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods provides perspectives on topics relevant to research in the field of business and management
For general enquiries email administrator@ejbrm.com
Click here to see other Scholarly Electronic Journals published by API
For a range of research text books on this and complimentary topics visit the Academic Bookshop
Information about The European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies is available here

linkedin-120 

 

twitter2-125 

 

fb_logo-125 

 
Journal Issue
Volume 18 Issue 2 / Dec 2020  pp72‑190

Editor: Ann Brown

Download PDF (free)

Assessment of Conventional and Advanced Methodologies: Application of Configurational Approach and Fuzzy Set Theory in Emotional Labor Research  pp72‑83

Saman Javed, Noshaba Batool

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Pedagogy and Evaluation: The Challenge for Business and Management Degree Courses in the 21st Century  pp84‑99

Ann Brown, Martin Rich

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Business School Teaching of Research Methods – A Review of Literature and Initial Data Collection for Undergraduate Business School Students  pp100‑114

Anthony Mitchell, Martin Rich

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The Three Positions for Interorganizational Interventionist Researcher: Navigating in the Supplier‑Customer Dyad  pp115‑128

Vesa Tiitola, Jouni Lyly-Yrjänäinen, Teemu Laine

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Abstract

The paper identifies and examines different positions of an interventionist researcher, facilitating value co‑creation for new technology in customer‑supplier dyads. The paper answers two research questions: (1) "what kind of positions can an interventionist researcher assume in a supplier‑customer dyad?" and (2) "what should an interventionist researcher consider when choosing a suitable position for her research design?" The paper reflects upon a longitudinal interventionist case study (2017‑2020) focused on facilitating and evaluating the value created by new medicine‑dispensing robot technology in home‑care in Nordic countries. The researchers conducted interventionist research in 11 supplier‑customer dyads, with multiple, evolving positions of the researcher(s). As a result, as a contribution to the existing knowledge about the role of the interventionist researchers, the paper proposes three positions that the interventionist researcher can take in an interorganizational supplier‑customer dyad: an auditor, a lawyer or a mediator. The auditor investigates the interface between the supplier and the customer as an outsider. The lawyer position compromises this perceived neutrality (but not independence) for deeper access to empirical data regarding one of the organisations. Thus, the lawyer actively pursues the status of 'one of us' with either the supplier or the customer. The mediator expands the previous positions by trying to achieve a status of 'one of us' in both organisations trying to understand both sides of the same story supporting both the supplier's and customers' activities. Importantly, as an extension to the existing knowledge, the paper argues that not only can an interventionist researcher move between the etic and emic domains, but she can also move within the supplier‑customer dyad under examination. Thus, when conducting research within the customer‑supplier dyads (and within similarly complex contexts), the interventionist researcher needs to be aware of the existence of different positions and her actual position to the subject of interventionist study. Indeed, the interventionist researcher may choose her role, or the role may be a result of an evolutionary process. The role is 'given' by the people the interventionist researcher interacts with and, thus, not something the researcher can completely decide by herself. However, the interventionist researcher can pursue a specific role that fits her research agenda and design. In any case, the researcher needs to be honest and transparent regarding the actually taken position to avoid potential methodological pitfalls arising from complex, novel research settings. 

 

Keywords: interventionist research (IVR), action research, supplier-customer dyad, positions, value co-creation, interorganizational management accounting

 

Share |
Experience Sampling Methodology: A Systematic Review and Discussion for Organizational Research  pp129‑141

Ozge Can

Look inside Download PDF (free)

A Reflection on SSM as a Critical Social Action Research Method: Towards Improvement of Project Governance  pp142‑152

Carin Venter

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The Discovery of Grounded Theory Practices for Software Engineering Research  pp153‑165

Rozilawati Razali, Mashal Kasem Alqudah, Dzulaiha Aryanee Putri Zainal

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The Research Audit Trail: Methodological Guidance for Application in Practice  pp166‑177

Marian Carcary

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Teaching Research Methodology: Everything’s a Case  pp178‑188

CD Reddy

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Editorial for EJBRM issue 18 volume 2  pp189‑190

Ann Brown

Look inside Download PDF (free)